Audit Integrity Skill

Enforce output quality, intellectual honesty, and continuous improvement across security audits and code reviews.

When to Use

• Perform security analyses, threat models, code reviews, or quality audits.
• Validate that every finding has verified code evidence and taint flow.
• Prevent the suppression or rationalization of security findings.
• Evaluate draft reports against the quality gate threshold (score ≥ 8/10).
• Record lessons learned and security memories after you complete a scan.

Components

This skill provides 7 modular capabilities in the references/ directory. Load each file when you reach its execution phase:

Execution Flow

Load reference files as you reach each phase:

1. Before analysis: If scope or policy is not clear, read [references/clarification-protocol.md](references/clarification-protocol.md). Ask a maximum of 2 targeted questions.
2. During analysis: Follow [references/non-negotiable-behaviors.md](references/non-negotiable-behaviors.md). At each triage decision, consult [references/anti-rationalization-guard.md](references/anti-rationalization-guard.md).
3. On tool or search failure: Follow [references/retry-protocol.md](references/retry-protocol.md). Do not assume code is secure without verification.
4. After initial analysis: Complete a second pass with the checklist in [references/self-critique-loop.md](references/self-critique-loop.md). Verify taint traces and manifest coverage.
5. Before delivery: Score the draft report using [references/self-reflection-quality-gate.md](references/self-reflection-quality-gate.md). All categories must score ≥ 8.
6. Final delivery: Record lessons and memories using [references/self-learning-system.md](references/self-learning-system.md).