跳到主要内容

consulting-analysis 精选

Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or write professional research reports including but not limited to market analysis, consumer insights, brand analysis, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment due diligence, or any consulting-grade analytical report. This skill operates in two phases — (1) generating a structured analysis framework with chapter skeleton, data query requirements, and analysis logic, and (2) after data collection by other skills, producing the final consulting-grade report with structured narratives, embedded charts, and strategic insights.

在 GitHub 打开

安装方式

cp -r skills/public/consulting-analysis ~/.claude/skills/consulting-analysis

把该 skill 目录放进客户端 skills 目录。不同客户端的目录可能不同,Claude Code 默认是 ~/.claude/skills/

整仓一次性获取:git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bytedance/deer-flow.git

依赖与权限

  • 无需 API Key
  • 无需联网
  • 依赖外部命令:make convert
  • 以上为按正文与 frontmatter 自动推断的信号,仅供参考;安装前建议先阅读原文。
触发场景
create

SKILL.md 正文

来源 bytedance/deer-flow@b346b17 · 许可 MIT · 内容未修改

Professional Research Report Skill

Overview

This skill produces professional, consulting-grade research reports in Markdown format, covering domains such as market analysis, consumer insights, brand strategy, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment research, and macroeconomic analysis. It operates across two distinct phases:

  1. Phase 1 — Analysis Framework Generation: Given a research subject, produce a rigorous analysis framework including chapter skeleton, per-chapter data requirements, analysis logic, and visualization plan.
  2. Phase 2 — Report Generation: After data has been collected by other skills, synthesize all inputs into a final polished report.

The output adheres to McKinsey/BCG consulting voice standards. The report language follows the output_locale setting (default: zh_CN for Chinese).

Data Authenticity Protocol

Strict Adherence Rule: All data presented in the report and visualized in charts MUST be derived directly from the provided Data Summary or External Search Findings.

  • NO Hallucinations: Do not invent, estimate, or simulate data. If data is missing, state "Data not available" rather than fabricating numbers.
  • Traceable Sources: Every major claim and chart must be traceable back to the input data package.

Core Capabilities

  • Design analysis frameworks from scratch given only a research subject and scope
  • Transform raw data into structured, high-depth research reports
  • Follow the "Visual Anchor → Data Contrast → Integrated Analysis" flow per sub-chapter
  • Produce insights following the "Data → User Psychology → Strategy Implication" chain
  • Embed pre-generated charts and construct comparison tables
  • Generate inline citations formatted per GB/T 7714-2015 standards
  • Output reports in the language specified by output_locale with professional consulting tone
  • Adapt analytical depth and structure to domain (marketing, finance, industry, etc.)

When to Use This Skill

Always load this skill when:

  • User asks for a market analysis, consumer insight report, financial analysis, industry research, or any consulting-grade analytical report
  • User provides a research subject and needs a structured analysis framework before data collection
  • User provides data summaries, analysis frameworks, or chart files to be synthesized into a report
  • User needs a professional consulting-style research report
  • The task involves transforming research findings into structured strategic narratives

Phase 1: Analysis Framework Generation

Purpose

Given a research subject (e.g., "Gen-Z Skincare Market Analysis", "NEV Industry Competitive Landscape", "Brand X Consumer Profiling"), produce a complete analysis framework that serves as the blueprint for downstream data collection and final report generation.

Phase 1 Inputs

InputDescriptionRequired
Research SubjectThe topic or question to be analyzedYes
Scope / ConstraintsGeographic scope, time range, industry segment, target audience, etc.Optional
Specific AnglesAny particular angles or hypotheses the user wants exploredOptional
DomainThe analytical domain: market, finance, industry, brand, consumer, investment, etc.Inferred

Phase 1 Workflow

Step 1.1: Understand the Research Subject

  • Parse the research subject to identify the core entity (market, brand, product, industry, consumer segment, financial instrument, etc.)
  • Identify the analytical domain (marketing, finance, industry, competitive, consumer, investment, macro, etc.)
  • Determine the natural analytical dimensions based on domain:
DomainTypical Dimensions
Market AnalysisMarket size, growth trends, market segmentation, growth drivers, competitive landscape, consumer profiling
Brand AnalysisBrand positioning, market share, consumer perception, marketing strategy, competitor comparison
Consumer InsightsDemographic profiling, purchase behavior, decision journey, pain points, scenario analysis
Financial AnalysisMacro environment, industry trends, company fundamentals, financial metrics, valuation, risk assessment
Industry ResearchValue chain analysis, market size, competitive landscape, policy environment, technology trends, entry barriers
Investment Due DiligenceBusiness model, financial health, management assessment, market opportunity, risk factors, exit pathways
Competitive IntelligenceCompetitor identification, strategic comparison, SWOT analysis, differentiated positioning, market dynamics

Step 1.2: Select Analysis Frameworks & Models

Based on the identified domain and research subject, select one or more professional analysis frameworks to structure the reasoning in each chapter. The chosen frameworks guide the Analysis Logic in the chapter skeleton (Step 1.3).

Strategic & Environmental Analysis

FrameworkDescriptionBest For
SWOT AnalysisStrengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, ThreatsBrand assessment, competitive positioning, strategic planning
PEST / PESTEL AnalysisPolitical, Economic, Social, Technological (+ Environmental, Legal)Macro-environment scanning, market entry assessment, policy impact analysis
Porter's Five ForcesSupplier bargaining power, buyer bargaining power, threat of new entrants, threat of substitutes, industry rivalryIndustry competitive landscape, entry barrier assessment, profit margin analysis
Porter's Diamond ModelFactor conditions, demand conditions, related industries, firm strategy & structureNational/regional competitive advantage analysis
VRIO AnalysisValue, Rarity, Imitability, OrganizationCore competency assessment, resource advantage analysis

Market & Growth Analysis

FrameworkDescriptionBest For
STP AnalysisSegmentation, Targeting, PositioningMarket segmentation, target market selection, brand positioning
BCG Matrix (Growth-Share Matrix)Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, DogsProduct portfolio management, resource allocation decisions
Ansoff MatrixMarket penetration, market development, product development, diversificationGrowth strategy selection
Product Life Cycle (PLC)Introduction, growth, maturity, declineProduct strategy formulation, market timing decisions
TAM-SAM-SOMTotal / Serviceable / Obtainable MarketMarket sizing, opportunity quantification
Technology Adoption LifecycleInnovators → Early Adopters → Early Majority → Late Majority → LaggardsEmerging technology/category penetration analysis

Consumer & Behavioral Analysis

FrameworkDescriptionBest For
Consumer Decision JourneyAwareness → Consideration → Evaluation → Purchase → LoyaltyConsumer behavior path mapping, touchpoint optimization
AARRR Funnel (Pirate Metrics)Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Revenue, ReferralUser growth analysis, conversion rate optimization
RFM ModelRecency, Frequency, MonetaryCustomer value segmentation, precision marketing
Maslow's Hierarchy of NeedsPhysiological → Safety → Social → Esteem → Self-actualizationConsumer psychology analysis, product value proposition
Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD)The "job" a user needs to accomplish in a specific contextDemand insight, product innovation direction

Financial & Valuation Analysis

FrameworkDescriptionBest For
DuPont AnalysisROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity MultiplierProfitability decomposition, financial health diagnosis
DCF (Discounted Cash Flow)Free cash flow discountingEnterprise/project valuation
Comparable Company AnalysisPE, PB, PS, EV/EBITDA multiples comparisonRelative valuation, peer benchmarking
EVA (Economic Value Added)After-tax operating profit - Cost of capitalValue creation capability assessment

Competitive & Strategic Positioning

FrameworkDescriptionBest For
BenchmarkingKey performance indicator item-by-item comparisonCompetitor gap analysis, best practice identification
Strategic Group MappingCluster competitors along two key dimensionsCompetitive landscape visualization, white-space identification
Value Chain AnalysisPrimary activities + support activities value decompositionCost advantage sources, differentiation opportunity identification
Blue Ocean StrategyValue curve, four-action framework (Eliminate-Reduce-Raise-Create)Differentiated innovation, new market space creation
Perceptual MappingPlot brand positions along two consumer-perceived dimensionsBrand positioning analysis, market gap discovery

Industry & Supply Chain Analysis

FrameworkDescriptionBest For
Industry Value ChainUpstream → Midstream → Downstream decompositionIndustry structure understanding, profit distribution analysis
Gartner Hype CycleTechnology Trigger → Peak of Inflated Expectations → Trough of Disillusionment → Slope of Enlightenment → Plateau of ProductivityEmerging technology maturity assessment
GE-McKinsey MatrixIndustry Attractiveness × Competitive StrengthBusiness portfolio prioritization, investment decisions

Selection Principles

  1. Domain-First: Based on the domain identified in Step 1.1, select 2-4 most relevant frameworks from the toolkit above
  2. Complementary: Choose complementary rather than overlapping frameworks (e.g., macro-level with PESTEL + micro-level with Porter's Five Forces)
  3. Depth over Breadth: Better to deeply apply 2 frameworks than superficially stack 6
  4. Data-Feasible: Selected frameworks must be supportable by downstream data collection skills — if the data required by a framework cannot be reasonably obtained, downgrade or substitute
  5. Explicit Mapping: In the chapter skeleton, explicitly annotate which framework each chapter uses and how it is applied

Framework Selection Output Format

## Framework Selection

| Chapter | Selected Framework(s) | Application |
|---------|----------------------|-------------|
| Market Size & Growth Trends | TAM-SAM-SOM + Product Life Cycle | TAM-SAM-SOM to quantify market space, PLC to determine market stage |
| Competitive Landscape Assessment | Porter's Five Forces + Strategic Group Mapping | Five Forces to assess industry competition intensity, Group Mapping to visualize competitive positioning |
| Consumer Profiling | RFM + Consumer Decision Journey | RFM to segment customer value, Decision Journey to identify key conversion nodes |
| Brand Strategy Recommendations | SWOT + Blue Ocean Strategy | SWOT to summarize overall landscape, Blue Ocean to guide differentiation direction |

Step 1.3: Design Chapter Skeleton

Produce a hierarchical chapter structure. Each chapter must include:

  1. Chapter Title — Professional, concise, subject-based (follow titling constraints in Formatting section)
  2. Analysis Objective — What this chapter aims to reveal
  3. Analysis Logic — The reasoning chain or framework (must reference the frameworks selected in Step 1.2)
  4. Core Hypothesis — Preliminary hypotheses to be validated or refuted by data

Chapter Skeleton Output Format

## Analysis Framework

### Chapter 1: [Title]
- **Analysis Objective**: [This chapter aims to...]
- **Analysis Logic**: [Framework or reasoning chain used]
- **Core Hypothesis**: [Hypotheses to validate]
- **Data Requirements**: (see Step 1.4)
- **Visualization Plan**: (see Step 1.5)

### Chapter 2: [Title]
...

Step 1.4: Define Data Query Requirements Per Chapter

For each chapter, specify exactly what data needs to be collected. This is the bridge to downstream data collection skills.

Each data requirement entry must include:

FieldDescription
Data MetricThe specific metric or data point needed (e.g., "China skincare market size 2020-2025 (in billion CNY)")
Data TypeQuantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed
Suggested SourcesSuggested source categories: Industry reports, financial statements, government statistics, social media, e-commerce platforms, survey data, news
Search KeywordsSuggested search queries for data collection agents
PriorityP0 (Required) / P1 (Important) / P2 (Supplementary)
Time RangeThe time period the data should cover

Data Requirements Output Format (per chapter)

#### Data Requirements

| # | Data Metric | Data Type | Suggested Sources | Search Keywords | Priority | Time Range |
|---|-------------|-----------|-------------------|-----------------|----------|------------|
| 1 | Market size (billion CNY) | Quantitative | Industry reports, government statistics | "China skincare market size 2024" | P0 | 2020-2025 |
| 2 | CAGR | Quantitative | Industry reports | "skincare CAGR growth rate" | P0 | 2020-2025 |
| 3 | Sub-category share | Quantitative | E-commerce platforms, industry reports | "skincare category share cream serum sunscreen" | P1 | Latest |
| 4 | Policy & regulatory updates | Qualitative | Government announcements, news | "cosmetics regulation 2024" | P2 | Past 1 year |

Step 1.5: Define Visualization & Content Structure Per Chapter

For each chapter, specify the planned visualization and content structure for the final report:

FieldDescription
Visualization TypeChart type: Line chart, bar chart, pie chart, scatter plot, radar chart, heatmap, Sankey diagram, comparison table, etc.
Visualization TitleDescriptive title for the chart
Visualization Data MappingWhich data indicators map to X/Y axes or segments
Comparison Table DesignColumn headers and comparison dimensions for the data contrast table
Argument StructureThe planned "What → Why → So What" narrative outline

Visualization Plan Output Format (per chapter)

#### Visualization & Content Plan

**Chart 1**: [Type] — [Title]
- X-axis: [Dimension], Y-axis: [Metric]
- Data source: Corresponds to Data Requirement #1, #2

**Comparison Table**:
| Dimension | Item A | Item B | Item C |
|-----------|--------|--------|--------|

**Argument Structure**:
1. **Observation (What)**: [Surface phenomenon revealed by data]
2. **Attribution (Why)**: [Driving factors or underlying causes]
3. **Implication (So What)**: [Strategic implications or recommended actions]

Step 1.6: Output Complete Analysis Framework

Assemble all outputs into a single, structured Analysis Framework Document:

# [Research Subject] Analysis Framework

## Research Overview
- **Research Subject**: [...]
- **Scope**: [Geography, time range, industry segment]
- **Analysis Domain**: [Market / Finance / Industry / Brand / Consumer / ...]
- **Core Research Questions**: [1-3 key questions]

## Framework Selection

| Chapter | Selected Framework(s) | Application |
|---------|----------------------|-------------|
| ... | ... | ... |

## Chapter Skeleton

### 1. [Chapter Title]
- **Analysis Objective**: [...]
- **Analysis Logic**: [...]
- **Core Hypothesis**: [...]

#### Data Requirements
| # | Data Metric | Data Type | Suggested Sources | Search Keywords | Priority | Time Range |
|---|-------------|-----------|-------------------|-----------------|----------|------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

#### Visualization & Content Plan
[Chart plan + Comparison table design + Argument structure]

### 2. [Chapter Title]
...

### N. [Chapter Title]
...

## Data Collection Task List
[Consolidate all P0/P1 data requirements across chapters into a structured task list for downstream data collection skills to execute]

Phase 1 Quality Checklist

  • [ ] Analysis framework covers all natural dimensions for the identified domain
  • [ ] 2-4 professional analysis frameworks are selected and explicitly mapped to chapters
  • [ ] Selected frameworks are complementary (not overlapping) and data-feasible
  • [ ] Each chapter has clear Analysis Objective, Analysis Logic (referencing chosen framework), and Core Hypothesis
  • [ ] Data requirements are specific, measurable, and include search keywords
  • [ ] Every chapter has at least one visualization plan
  • [ ] Data priorities (P0/P1/P2) are assigned realistically
  • [ ] The framework is actionable — a data collection agent can execute on the Search Keywords directly
  • [ ] Data Collection Task List is comprehensive and deduplicated

Phase 1→2 Handoff: Data Collection & Chart Generation

After the analysis framework is generated, it is handed off to other data collection skills (e.g., deep-research, data-analysis, web search agents) to:

  1. Execute the Search Keywords from each chapter's data requirements
  2. Collect quantitative data, qualitative insights, and source URLs
  3. Generate charts based on the Visualization & Content Plan
  4. Return a Data Package containing:
  • Data Summary: Raw numbers, metrics, and qualitative findings per chapter
  • Chart Files: Generated chart images with local file paths
  • External Search Findings: Source URLs and summaries for citations
This skill does NOT perform data collection. It only produces the framework (Phase 1) and the final report (Phase 2).
Chart Generation: If a visualization/charting skill is available (e.g., data-analysis, image-generation), chart generation can be deferred to the beginning of Phase 2 — see Step 2.3.

Phase 2: Report Generation

Purpose

Receive the completed Analysis Framework and Data Package from upstream, and synthesize them into a final consulting-grade report.

Phase 2 Inputs

InputDescriptionRequired
Analysis FrameworkThe framework document produced in Phase 1Yes
Data SummaryCollected data organized per chapter from the data collection phaseYes
Chart FilesLocal file paths for generated chart images. If not provided, will be generated in Step 2.3 using available visualization skillsOptional
External Search FindingsURLs and summaries for inline citationsOptional

Phase 2 Workflow

Step 2.1: Receive and Validate Inputs

Verify that all required inputs are present:

  1. Analysis Framework — Confirm it contains chapter skeleton, data requirements, and visualization plans
  2. Data Summary — Confirm it contains data organized per chapter, cross-reference against P0 requirements
  3. Chart Files — Confirm file paths are valid local paths

If any P0 data is missing, note it in the report and flag for the user.

Step 2.2: Map Report Structure

Map the final report structure from the Analysis Framework:

  1. Abstract — Executive summary with key takeaways
  2. Introduction — Background, objectives, methodology
  3. Main Body Chapters (2...N) — Mapped from the Framework's chapter skeleton
  4. Conclusion — Pure, objective synthesis
  5. References — GB/T 7714-2015 formatted references

Step 2.3: Generate Chapter Charts (Pre-Report Visualization)

Before writing the report, generate all planned charts from the Analysis Framework's Visualization & Content Plan. This step ensures every sub-chapter has its "Visual Anchor" ready before narrative writing begins.

When to Execute This Step

  • Chart Files already provided: Skip this step — proceed directly to Step 2.4.
  • Chart Files NOT provided but a visualization skill is available: Execute this step to generate all charts first.
  • No Chart Files and no visualization skill available: Skip this step — use comparison tables as the primary visual anchor in Step 2.4, and note the absence of charts.

Chart Generation Workflow

  1. Extract Chart Tasks: Parse all Visualization & Content Plan entries from the Analysis Framework to build a chart generation task list:
#ChapterChart TypeChart TitleData MappingData Source
12.1Line chartMarket Size Trend 2020-2025X: Year, Y: Market Size (billion CNY)Data Requirement #1, #2
23.1Pie chartConsumer Age DistributionSegments: Age groups, Values: Share %Data Requirement #5
..................
  1. Prepare Chart Data: For each chart task, extract the corresponding data points from the Data Summary.
CRITICAL: Use ONLY the numbers provided in the Data Summary. Do NOT invent or "smooth" data to make charts look better. If data points are missing, the chart must reflect that reality (e.g., broken line or missing bar), or the chart type must be adjusted.
  1. Delegate to Visualization Skill: Invoke the available visualization/charting skill (e.g., data-analysis) for each chart task with:
  • Chart type and title
  • Structured data
  • Axis labels and formatting preferences
  • Output file path convention: charts/chapter_{N}_{chart_index}.png
  1. Collect Chart File Paths: Record all generated chart file paths for embedding in Step 2.4:
## Generated Charts
| # | Chapter | Chart Title | File Path |
|---|---------|-------------|-----------|
| 1 | 2.1 | Market Size Trend 2020-2025 | charts/chapter_2_1.png |
| 2 | 3.1 | Consumer Age Distribution | charts/chapter_3_1.png |
  1. Validate: Confirm all P0-priority charts have been generated. If any chart generation fails, note it and fall back to comparison tables for that sub-chapter.
Principle: Complete ALL chart generation before starting report writing. This ensures a consistent visual narrative and avoids interleaving generation with writing.

Step 2.4: Write the Report

For each sub-chapter, follow the "Visual Anchor → Data Contrast → Integrated Analysis" flow:

  1. Visual Evidence Block: Embed charts using ![Image Description](Actual_File_Path) — use the file paths collected in Step 2.3
  2. Data Contrast Table: Create a Markdown comparison table for key metrics
Source Rule: Every number in the table must come from the Data Summary. No hallucinations.
  1. Integrated Narrative Analysis: Write analytical text following "What → Why → So What"
Narrative Rule: Narrative must explain the provided data. Do not make claims unsupported by the inputs.

Each sub-chapter must end with a robust analytical paragraph (min. 200 words) that:

  • Synthesizes conflicting or reinforcing data points
  • Reveals the underlying user tension or opportunity
  • Optionally ends with a punchy "One-Liner Truth" in a blockquote (>)

Step 2.5: Final Structure Self-Check

Before outputting, confirm the report contains all sections in order:

Abstract → 1. Intro

质量与来源

所属仓库
bytedance/deer-flow
仓库星标
8.4 万
最近更新
今天
采集时间
今天
commit
b346b17fce89
内容指纹
sha256:5bc99df7e5f8af5
文件路径
skills/public/consulting-analysis/SKILL.md

同仓库其它 Skill

查看全部 32 个
blocking-io-guard
Ensure async-path backend code that could block the asyncio event loop is protected by a teeth-verified runtime anchor in tests/blocking_io/. Use when changing backend Python under app/, packages/harness/deerflow/, or scripts/, when running a blocking-IO triage round over the whole repo, or when a reviewer/CI asks for blocking-IO coverage. Runs a deterministic scan (changed-lines or full-repo), routes each candidate, drafts/extends an anchor, and proves it fails when the blocking IO regresses.
精选 bytedance/deer-flow 8.4 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
deerflow-maintainer-orchestrator
Use when a DeerFlow maintainer needs comment-only GitHub issue or PR handling: resolve issue/PR scopes with gh, analyze issues, post or draft issue comments, perform PR review comments, review PR or issue batches, compare competing PRs that target the same issue, give fix strategy, risk classification, and validation guidance. Intended for maintainers and trusted local agents, not general contributors.
精选 bytedance/deer-flow 8.4 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
engineer-system-change
Evaluate and carry out non-trivial software-system changes from first principles. Use when assessing RFCs, issues, designs, features, refactors, migrations, dependency changes, or proposed fields, events, APIs, modules, and services whose need, consumers, system fit, validation, or rollback require scrutiny. Read the actual system, identify the concrete problem and named semantic consumers, choose the smallest sufficient solution, reject pseudo-requirements and speculative abstractions, and require evidence proportional to risk. Do not use for mechanical edits, source-code explanation, or a dedicated review of an already-complete diff.
精选 bytedance/deer-flow 8.4 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
smoke-test
End-to-end smoke test skill for DeerFlow. Guides through: 1) Pulling latest code, 2) Docker OR Local installation and deployment (user preference, default to Local if Docker network issues), 3) Service availability verification, 4) Health check, 5) Final test report. Use when the user says "run smoke test", "smoke test deployment", "verify installation", "test service availability", "end-to-end test", or similar.
精选 bytedance/deer-flow 8.4 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
academic-paper-review
Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".
精选 bytedance/deer-flow 8.4 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
bootstrap
Generate a personalized SOUL.md through a warm, adaptive onboarding conversation. Trigger when the user wants to create, set up, or initialize their AI partner's identity — e.g., "create my SOUL.md", "bootstrap my agent", "set up my AI partner", "define who you are", "let's do onboarding", "personalize this AI", "make you mine", or when a SOUL.md is missing. Also trigger for updates: "update my SOUL.md", "change my AI's personality", "tweak the soul".
精选 bytedance/deer-flow 8.4 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端

相似 Skill

更多「研究」
last30days
Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days. Pulls posts and engagement from Reddit, X, YouTube, TikTok, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web. Includes a doctor health check to diagnose broken or missing sources.
精选 mvanhorn/last30days-skill 6.4 万 原文
Claude CodeCodex CLIMCP 客户端
agent-reach
MUST USE when user wants to 调研/research/搜索/search/查/找/look up anything on the internet — e.g. 全网调研 X / 帮我调研一下 X / 查一下 X / 搜搜 X / 看看大家怎么评价 X / X 上有什么讨论 / research this topic。 Also MUST USE when user mentions any platform or shares any URL/链接: 小红书/xiaohongshu/xhs, Twitter/推特/X, B站/bilibili, Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, V2EX, LinkedIn/领英/Boss直聘/招聘/求职/jobs, YouTube, GitHub code search, 小宇宙播客, 雪球/股票行情, RSS feeds, or any web URL. 16 platforms, multi-backend routing (OpenCLI / per-platform CLIs / APIs). Zero config for 6 channels. Run `agent-reach doctor --json` to see which backend serves each platform right now. NOT for: 写报告/数据分析/翻译等内容加工(本 skill 只负责从互联网获取内容); 发帖/评论/点赞等写操作;已有专门 skill 的平台(先用专门 skill)。 【路由方式】SKILL.md 包含路由表和常用命令,复杂场景需按需阅读对应分类的 references/*.md。 分类:search / social (小红书/推特/B站/V2EX/Reddit/Facebook/Instagram) / career(LinkedIn/Boss直聘) / dev(github) / web(网页/文章/RSS) / video(YouTube/B站/播客) / finance(雪球/股票)。
精选 Panniantong/Agent-Reach 9.6 万 原文
Claude CodeCursorMCP 客户端
academic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정, revisar artículo, revisión entre pares, revisión de manuscrito, informe de árbitro, revisa mi artículo, criticar artículo, simular revisión, revisión editorial, calibrar revisor.
精选 Imbad0202/academic-research-skills 5.2 万 原文
Claude Code
academic-paper
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, I got reviewer comments, revision roadmap, should we push back, conference rebuttal, grant panel response, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, check citations, citation check, check my references, verify references, look over the refs, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 我收到審查意見, 修訂路線圖, 評估回覆, 檢查引用, 引用檢查, 檢查參考文獻, 核對文獻, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견을 받았어, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사, enmendar mi artículo, redactar artículo, guía mi artículo, analizar reseñas, auditar mi respuesta, verificar borrador de respuesta, verificar citas, divulgación de IA.
精选 Imbad0202/academic-research-skills 5.2 万 原文
Claude Code
academic-pipeline
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로, flujo de trabajo académico, investigación a artículo, flujo completo de artículo, pipeline de investigación completa, publicación de investigación, flujo de trabajo completo del artículo.
精选 Imbad0202/academic-research-skills 5.2 万 原文
Claude Code
deep-research
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, WHY HOW WHAT papers, 3W literature scan, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 三段式文獻掃描, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題, 심층 연구, 문헌 조사, 체계적 문헌고찰, 메타분석, 사실 확인, 연구 방향을 잡아줘, 연구 주제 정하는 것을 도와줘, revisión de literatura, metaanálisis
精选 Imbad0202/academic-research-skills 5.2 万 原文
Claude Code