跳到主要内容

terraform-skill 精选

Use when working with Terraform or OpenTofu - creating modules, writing tests (native test framework, Terratest), setting up CI/CD pipelines, reviewing configurations, choosing between testing approaches, debugging state issues, implementing security scanning (trivy, checkov), or making infrastructure-as-code architecture decisions

自动化 Codex CLIMCP 客户端 v1.6.0 Apache-2.0 3.6 万
在 GitHub 打开

安装方式

cp -r plugins/bundle/cloudpaw/skills/terraform-skill ~/.claude/skills/terraform-skill

把该 skill 目录放进客户端 skills 目录。不同客户端的目录可能不同,Claude Code 默认是 ~/.claude/skills/

整仓一次性获取:git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentscope-ai/QwenPaw.git

依赖与权限

  • 无需 API Key
  • 无需联网
  • 依赖外部命令:go aws az terraform
  • 以上为按正文与 frontmatter 自动推断的信号,仅供参考;安装前建议先阅读原文。
触发场景
working with Terraform

SKILL.md 正文

来源 agentscope-ai/QwenPaw@02b6a6d · 许可 Apache-2.0 · 内容未修改

Terraform Skill for Claude

Comprehensive Terraform and OpenTofu guidance covering testing, modules, CI/CD, and production patterns. Based on terraform-best-practices.com and enterprise experience.

When to Use This Skill

Activate this skill when:

  • Creating new Terraform or OpenTofu configurations or modules
  • Setting up testing infrastructure for IaC code
  • Deciding between testing approaches (validate, plan, frameworks)
  • Structuring multi-environment deployments
  • Implementing CI/CD for infrastructure-as-code
  • Reviewing or refactoring existing Terraform/OpenTofu projects
  • Choosing between module patterns or state management approaches

Don't use this skill for:

  • Basic Terraform/OpenTofu syntax questions (Claude knows this)
  • Provider-specific API reference (link to docs instead)
  • Cloud platform questions unrelated to Terraform/OpenTofu

Core Principles

1. Code Structure Philosophy

Module Hierarchy:

TypeWhen to UseScope
Resource ModuleSingle logical group of connected resourcesVPC + subnets, Security group + rules
Infrastructure ModuleCollection of resource modules for a purposeMultiple resource modules in one region/account
CompositionComplete infrastructureSpans multiple regions/accounts

Hierarchy: Resource → Resource Module → Infrastructure Module → Composition

Directory Structure:

environments/        # Environment-specific configurations
├── prod/
├── staging/
└── dev/

modules/            # Reusable modules
├── networking/
├── compute/
└── data/

examples/           # Module usage examples (also serve as tests)
├── complete/
└── minimal/

Key principle from terraform-best-practices.com:

  • Separate environments (prod, staging) from modules (reusable components)
  • Use examples/ as both documentation and integration test fixtures
  • Keep modules small and focused (single responsibility)

For detailed module architecture, see: [Code Patterns: Module Types & Hierarchy](references/code-patterns.md)

2. Naming Conventions

Resources:

# Good: Descriptive, contextual
resource "aws_instance" "web_server" { }
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "application_logs" { }

# Good: "this" for singleton resources (only one of that type)
resource "aws_vpc" "this" { }
resource "aws_security_group" "this" { }

# Avoid: Generic names for non-singletons
resource "aws_instance" "main" { }
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" { }

Singleton Resources:

Use "this" when your module creates only one resource of that type:

✅ DO:

resource "aws_vpc" "this" {}           # Module creates one VPC
resource "aws_security_group" "this" {}  # Module creates one SG

❌ DON'T use "this" for multiple resources:

resource "aws_subnet" "this" {}  # If creating multiple subnets

Use descriptive names when creating multiple resources of the same type.

Variables:

# Prefix with context when needed
var.vpc_cidr_block          # Not just "cidr"
var.database_instance_class # Not just "instance_class"

Files:

  • main.tf - Primary resources
  • variables.tf - Input variables
  • outputs.tf - Output values
  • versions.tf - Provider versions
  • data.tf - Data sources (optional)

Testing Strategy Framework

Decision Matrix: Which Testing Approach?

Your SituationRecommended ApproachToolsCost
Quick syntax checkStatic analysisterraform validate, fmtFree
Pre-commit validationStatic + lintvalidate, tflint, trivy, checkovFree
Terraform 1.6+, simple logicNative test frameworkBuilt-in terraform testFree-Low
Pre-1.6, or Go expertiseIntegration testingTerratestLow-Med
Security/compliance focusPolicy as codeOPA, SentinelFree
Cost-sensitive workflowMock providers (1.7+)Native tests + mockingFree
Multi-cloud, complexFull integrationTerratest + real infraMed-High

Testing Pyramid for Infrastructure

        /\
       /  \          End-to-End Tests (Expensive)
      /____\         - Full environment deployment
     /      \        - Production-like setup
    /________\
   /          \      Integration Tests (Moderate)
  /____________\     - Module testing in isolation
 /              \    - Real resources in test account
/________________\   Static Analysis (Cheap)
                     - validate, fmt, lint
                     - Security scanning

Native Test Best Practices (1.6+)

Before generating test code:

  1. Validate schemas with Terraform MCP:
   Search provider docs → Get resource schema → Identify block types
  1. Choose correct command mode:
  • command = plan - Fast, for input validation
  • command = apply - Required for computed values and set-type blocks
  1. Handle set-type blocks correctly:
  • Cannot index with [0]
  • Use for expressions to iterate
  • Or use command = apply to materialize

Common patterns:

  • S3 encryption rules: set (use for expressions)
  • Lifecycle transitions: set (use for expressions)
  • IAM policy statements: set (use for expressions)

For detailed testing guides, see:

  • [Testing Frameworks Guide](references/testing-frameworks.md) - Deep dive into static analysis, native tests, and Terratest
  • [Quick Reference](references/quick-reference.md#testing-approach-selection) - Decision flowchart and command cheat sheet

Code Structure Standards

Resource Block Ordering

Strict ordering for consistency:

  1. count or for_each FIRST (blank line after)
  2. Other arguments
  3. tags as last real argument
  4. depends_on after tags (if needed)
  5. lifecycle at the very end (if needed)
# ✅ GOOD - Correct ordering
resource "aws_nat_gateway" "this" {
  count = var.create_nat_gateway ? 1 : 0

  allocation_id = aws_eip.this[0].id
  subnet_id     = aws_subnet.public[0].id

  tags = {
    Name = "${var.name}-nat"
  }

  depends_on = [aws_internet_gateway.this]

  lifecycle {
    create_before_destroy = true
  }
}

Variable Block Ordering

  1. description (ALWAYS required)
  2. type
  3. default
  4. validation
  5. nullable (when setting to false)
variable "environment" {
  description = "Environment name for resource tagging"
  type        = string
  default     = "dev"

  validation {
    condition     = contains(["dev", "staging", "prod"], var.environment)
    error_message = "Environment must be one of: dev, staging, prod."
  }

  nullable = false
}

For complete structure guidelines, see: [Code Patterns: Block Ordering & Structure](references/code-patterns.md#block-ordering--structure)

Count vs For_Each: When to Use Each

Quick Decision Guide

ScenarioUseWhy
Boolean condition (create or don't)count = condition ? 1 : 0Simple on/off toggle
Simple numeric replicationcount = 3Fixed number of identical resources
Items may be reordered/removedfor_each = toset(list)Stable resource addresses
Reference by keyfor_each = mapNamed access to resources
Multiple named resourcesfor_eachBetter maintainability

Common Patterns

Boolean conditions:

# ✅ GOOD - Boolean condition
resource "aws_nat_gateway" "this" {
  count = var.create_nat_gateway ? 1 : 0
  # ...
}

Stable addressing with for_each:

# ✅ GOOD - Removing "us-east-1b" only affects that subnet
resource "aws_subnet" "private" {
  for_each = toset(var.availability_zones)

  availability_zone = each.key
  # ...
}

# ❌ BAD - Removing middle AZ recreates all subsequent subnets
resource "aws_subnet" "private" {
  count = length(var.availability_zones)

  availability_zone = var.availability_zones[count.index]
  # ...
}

For migration guides and detailed examples, see: [Code Patterns: Count vs For_Each](references/code-patterns.md#count-vs-for_each-deep-dive)

Locals for Dependency Management

Use locals to ensure correct resource deletion order:

# Problem: Subnets might be deleted after CIDR blocks, causing errors
# Solution: Use try() in locals to hint deletion order

locals {
  # References secondary CIDR first, falling back to VPC
  # Forces Terraform to delete subnets before CIDR association
  vpc_id = try(
    aws_vpc_ipv4_cidr_block_association.this[0].vpc_id,
    aws_vpc.this.id,
    ""
  )
}

resource "aws_vpc" "this" {
  cidr_block = "10.0.0.0/16"
}

resource "aws_vpc_ipv4_cidr_block_association" "this" {
  count = var.add_secondary_cidr ? 1 : 0

  vpc_id     = aws_vpc.this.id
  cidr_block = "10.1.0.0/16"
}

resource "aws_subnet" "public" {
  vpc_id     = local.vpc_id  # Uses local, not direct reference
  cidr_block = "10.1.0.0/24"
}

Why this matters:

  • Prevents deletion errors when destroying infrastructure
  • Ensures correct dependency order without explicit depends_on
  • Particularly useful for VPC configurations with secondary CIDR blocks

For detailed examples, see: [Code Patterns: Locals for Dependency Management](references/code-patterns.md#locals-for-dependency-management)

Module Development

Standard Module Structure

my-module/
├── README.md           # Usage documentation
├── main.tf             # Primary resources
├── variables.tf        # Input variables with descriptions
├── outputs.tf          # Output values
├── versions.tf         # Provider version constraints
├── examples/
│   ├── minimal/        # Minimal working example
│   └── complete/       # Full-featured example
└── tests/              # Test files
    └── module_test.tftest.hcl  # Or .go

Best Practices Summary

Variables:

  • ✅ Always include description
  • ✅ Use explicit type constraints
  • ✅ Provide sensible default values where appropriate
  • ✅ Add validation blocks for complex constraints
  • ✅ Use sensitive = true for secrets

Outputs:

  • ✅ Always include description
  • ✅ Mark sensitive outputs with sensitive = true
  • ✅ Consider returning objects for related values
  • ✅ Document what consumers should do with each output

For detailed module patterns, see:

  • [Module Patterns Guide](references/module-patterns.md) - Variable best practices, output design, ✅ DO vs ❌ DON'T patterns
  • [Quick Reference](references/quick-reference.md#common-patterns) - Resource naming, variable naming, file organization

CI/CD Integration

Recommended Workflow Stages

  1. Validate - Format check + syntax validation + linting
  2. Test - Run automated tests (native or Terratest)
  3. Plan - Generate and review execution plan
  4. Apply - Execute changes (with approvals for production)

Cost Optimization Strategy

  1. Use mocking for PR validation (free)
  2. Run integration tests only on main branch (controlled cost)
  3. Implement auto-cleanup (prevent orphaned resources)
  4. Tag all test resources (track spending)

For complete CI/CD templates, see:

  • [CI/CD Workflows Guide](references/ci-cd-workflows.md) - GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Atlantis integration, cost optimization
  • [Quick Reference](references/quick-reference.md#troubleshooting-guide) - Common CI/CD issues and solutions

Security & Compliance

Essential Security Checks

# Static security scanning
trivy config .
checkov -d .

Common Issues to Avoid

❌ Don't:

  • Store secrets in variables
  • Use default VPC
  • Skip encryption
  • Open security groups to 0.0.0.0/0

✅ Do:

  • Use AWS Secrets Manager / Parameter Store
  • Create dedicated VPCs
  • Enable encryption at rest
  • Use least-privilege security groups

For detailed security guidance, see:

  • [Security & Compliance Guide](references/security-compliance.md) - Trivy/Checkov integration, secrets management, state file security, compliance testing

Version Management

Version Constraint Syntax

version = "5.0.0"      # Exact (avoid - inflexible)
version = "~> 5.0"     # Recommended: 5.0.x only
version = ">= 5.0"     # Minimum (risky - breaking changes)

Strategy by Component

ComponentStrategyExample
TerraformPin minor versionrequired_version = "~> 1.9"
ProvidersPin major versionversion = "~> 5.0"
Modules (prod)Pin exact versionversion = "5.1.2"
Modules (dev)Allow patch updatesversion = "~> 5.1"

Update Workflow

# Lock versions initially
terraform init              # Creates .terraform.lock.hcl

# Update to latest within constraints
terraform init -upgrade     # Updates providers

# Review and test
terraform plan

For detailed version management, see: [Code Patterns: Version Management](references/code-patterns.md#version-management)

Modern Terraform Features (1.0+)

Feature Availability by Version

FeatureVersionUse Case
try() function0.13+Safe fallbacks, replaces element(concat())
nullable = false1.1+Prevent null values in variables
moved blocks1.1+Refactor without destroy/recreate
optional() with defaults1.3+Optional object attributes
Native testing1.6+Built-in test framework
Mock providers1.7+Cost-free unit testing
Provider functions1.8+Provider-specific data transformation
Cross-variable validation1.9+Validate relationships between variables
Write-only arguments1.11+Secrets never stored in state

Quick Examples

# try() - Safe fallbacks (0.13+)
output "sg_id" {
  value = try(aws_security_group.this[0].id, "")
}

# optional() - Optional attributes with defaults (1.3+)
variable "config" {
  type = object({
    name    = string
    timeout = optional(number, 300)  # Default: 300
  })
}

# Cross-variable validation (1.9+)
variable "environment" { type = string }
variable "backup_days" {
  type = number
  validation {
    condition     = var.environment == "prod" ? var.backup_days >= 7 : true
    error_message = "Production requires backup_days >= 7"
  }
}

For complete patterns and examples, see: [Code Patterns: Modern Terraform Features](references/code-patterns.md#modern-terraform-features-10)

Version-Specific Guidance

Terraform 1.0-1.5

  • Use Terratest for testing
  • No native testing framework available
  • Focus on static analysis and plan validation

Terraform 1.6+ / OpenTofu 1.6+

  • New: Native terraform test / tofu test command
  • Consider migrating from external frameworks for simple tests
  • Keep Terratest only for complex integration tests

Terraform 1.7+ / OpenTofu 1.7+

  • New: Mock providers for unit testing
  • Reduce cost by mocking external dependencies
  • Use real integration tests for final validation

Terraform vs OpenTofu

Both are fully supported by this skill. For licensing, governance, and feature comparison, see [Quick Reference: Terraform vs OpenTofu](references/quick-reference.md#terraform-vs-opentofu-comparison).

Detailed Guides

This skill uses progressive disclosure - essential information is in this main file, detailed guides are available when needed:

📚 Reference Files:

  • [Testing Frameworks](references/testing-frameworks.md) - In-depth guide to static analysis, native tests, and Terratest
  • [Module Patterns](references/module-patterns.md) - Module structure, variable/output best practices, ✅ DO vs ❌ DON'T patterns
  • [CI/CD Workflows](references/ci-cd-workflows.md) - GitHub Actions, GitLab CI templates, cost optimization, automated cleanup
  • [Security & Compliance](references/security-compliance.md) - Trivy/Checkov integration, secrets management, compliance testing
  • [Quick Reference](references/quick-reference.md) - Command cheat sheets, decision flowcharts, troubleshooting guide

How to use: When you need detailed information on a topic, reference the appropriate guide. Claude will load it on demand to provide comprehensive guidance.

License

This skill is licensed under the Apache License 2.0. See the LICENSE file for full terms.

Copyright © 2026 Anton Babenko

质量与来源

所属仓库
agentscope-ai/QwenPaw
仓库星标
3.6 万
最近更新
今天
采集时间
今天
commit
02b6a6d088e3
内容指纹
sha256:3d92521c1aea650
文件路径
plugins/bundle/cloudpaw/skills/terraform-skill/SKILL.md

同仓库其它 Skill

查看全部 48 个
edu-math-tutorial
数学题分步讲解视频的领域知识。适用场景:(1) 用户给出一道数学题并要求做讲解/ 解题视频;(2) 用户说"讲解这道题"、"生成解题视频"、"make a math tutorial"; (3) 需要中文数学教学视频,涉及方程、公式或几何图形。本 skill 只提供领域 知识(题目拆解、讲解节奏、旁白文案规范、版式与 KaTeX 排版风格);画面、 配音与成片一律用 Creator 原生 Element 与工具从源头构建。
精选 agentscope-ai/QwenPaw 3.6 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
professional-media-prompts
为 Creator 编译制作级视觉资产图、电影分镜图和参考生视频 Prompt。适用于 角色身份板/设定图、关键帧或多宫格分镜、短片动作节拍、R2V/I2V/T2V 提示词, 尤其适合要求角色一致性、镜头语言、参考图职责、Seedance 时间段或声音设计的 任务。不用于纯素材剪辑、只查询模型参数,或只评价已经生成的成片。
精选 agentscope-ai/QwenPaw 3.6 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
visual-asset-design
为角色/场景/道具设计视觉资产、编写或修复 VisualVariant 与阵容图的生成 Prompt 时使用。涵盖参考图布局(艺术身份板/序列关键帧/环境研究板/道具研究 板)、构图与镜头语言、图片审核误判规避、实体 continuity 与以主图为参考 的跨 Variant 衍生设计。不用于视频 Prompt 编译(见 professional-media-prompts)、 纯素材剪辑或只评价已生成产物。
精选 agentscope-ai/QwenPaw 3.6 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
alicloud_cli
阿里云 CLI 中文文档镜像检索与命令辅助:先走章节索引,再下钻正文页面,给出命令前必须有本地文档证据。
精选 agentscope-ai/QwenPaw 3.6 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
terraform-cli-setup
Terraform CLI 安装与初始化技能。当用户本地未安装 Terraform 时自动完成安装,确保 terraform 命令可用并能执行 init/validate。不负责 Provider 凭证配置,凭证在实际使用时由 terraform-skill 引导。
精选 agentscope-ai/QwenPaw 3.6 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
computer_use
Use computer_use for live Windows or macOS GUI work that structured tools cannot complete. Discover an approved app and window, act from fresh observations, and verify every requested result.
精选 agentscope-ai/QwenPaw 3.6 万 原文
Codex CLIMCP 客户端
agent-browser
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.
精选 shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice 6.7 万 原文
Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLI
presentation-structure
Knowledge about the presentation slide format, weight system, navigation, and section structure
精选 shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice 6.7 万 原文
Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLI
presentation-styling
Knowledge about CSS classes, component patterns, and syntax highlighting in the presentation
精选 shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice 6.7 万 原文
Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLI
vibe-to-agentic-framework
The conceptual framework behind the presentation — what "Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering" means, why the journey is structured the way it is, and how every slide fits the narrative arc
精选 shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice 6.7 万 原文
Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLI
time-skill
Display the current time in Pakistan Standard Time (PKT, UTC+5). Use when the user asks for the current time, Pakistan time, or PKT.
精选 shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice 6.7 万 原文
Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLI
weather-fetcher
Instructions for fetching current weather temperature data for Dubai, UAE from Open-Meteo API
精选 shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice 6.7 万 原文
Claude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLI