/understand-chat

Answer questions about this codebase using the knowledge graph in the project's data directory (.ua/knowledge-graph.json, or the legacy .understand-anything/knowledge-graph.json when that directory is present).

Graph Structure Reference

The knowledge graph JSON has this structure:

• project — {name, description, languages, frameworks, analyzedAt, gitCommitHash}
• nodes[] — each has {id, type, name, filePath?, summary, tags[], complexity, languageNotes?}
• Code node types: file, function, class, module, concept
• Non-code node types: config, document, service, table, endpoint, pipeline, schema, resource
• Domain/knowledge node types: domain, flow, step, article, entity, topic, claim, source
• IDs use the node type as prefix, e.g. file:path, function:path:name, config:path, article:path
• edges[] — each has {source, target, type, direction, weight}
• Key types: imports, contains, calls, depends_on, configures, documents, deploys, triggers, contains_flow, flow_step, related, cites
• layers[] — each has {id, name, description, nodeIds[]}
• tour[] — each has {order, title, description, nodeIds[]}

How to Read Efficiently

1. Use Grep to search within the JSON for relevant entries BEFORE reading the full file
2. Only read sections you need — don't dump the entire graph into context
3. Node names and summaries are the most useful fields for understanding
4. Edges tell you how components connect — follow imports and calls for dependency chains

Instructions

1. Resolve the data directory $UA_DIR. Run UA_DIR=$([ -d .understand-anything ] && echo .understand-anything || echo .ua) — this is the legacy .understand-anything/ when it already exists, otherwise the new .ua/. Check that $UA_DIR/knowledge-graph.json exists in the current project root. If not, tell the user to run /understand first.

1. Check graph freshness before using graph-derived context:

• Read project.gitCommitHash from the graph metadata as GRAPH_COMMIT_RAW. Resolve it as a commit before using it in any Git diff, then compare it with git rev-parse HEAD and inspect project-scoped committed and working-tree changes from the project root:

     GRAPH_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse --verify --end-of-options "${GRAPH_COMMIT_RAW}^{commit}" 2>/dev/null)
     git rev-parse HEAD
     git diff --name-only "$GRAPH_COMMIT" HEAD -- .
     git diff --cached --name-only -- .
     git diff --name-only -- .
     git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -- .

• The -- . pathspec is required: commits that only touch a sibling monorepo project must not make this graph stale. A hash mismatch alone is not stale when the project diff is empty.
• Ignore the selected data directory (.ua/ or legacy .understand-anything/) in every command's output because it contains generated graph artifacts, not project source drift.
• If the committed diff or any working-tree command reports project files, warn before answering that graph-derived context may omit those changes. Suggest: Run /understand to refresh the graph.
• Run the commit diff only when GRAPH_COMMIT_RAW resolves successfully. If the graph commit or Git metadata is missing, invalid, or unavailable, give a brief best-effort warning and continue instead of blocking.

1. Read project metadata only — use Grep or Read with a line limit to extract just the "project" section from the top of the file for context (name, description, languages, frameworks).

1. Search for relevant nodes — use Grep to search the knowledge graph file for the user's query keywords: "$ARGUMENTS"

• Search "name" fields: grep -i "query_keyword" in the graph file
• Search "summary" fields for semantic matches
• Search "tags" arrays for topic matches
• Note the id values of all matching nodes

1. Find connected edges — for each matched node ID, Grep for that ID in the edges section to find:

• What it imports or depends on (downstream)
• What calls or imports it (upstream)
• This gives you the 1-hop subgraph around the query

1. Read layer context — Grep for "layers" to understand which architectural layers the matched nodes belong to.

1. Answer the query using only the relevant subgraph:

• Reference specific files, functions, and relationships from the graph
• Explain which layer(s) are relevant and why
• Be concise but thorough — link concepts to actual code locations
• If the query doesn't match any nodes, say so and suggest related terms from the graph